Ancient Astronauts And Contemporary Skepticism

Over the course of the past 12 months, I intently assisted a colleague in writing a sequence of ten articles overlaying numerous elements of my ancient astronaut concept. All ten of those articles circulated extensively across the globe and look at counters on many sites indicated plentiful readership, however suggestions to me, or to her, from anyplace, was non-existent. There was neither criticism nor acclaim from anybody. Simply silence. I was starting to think that perhaps no one in world desires to take historical astronauts seriously.

In an try and make some progress, I decided to pay sixty dollars for a assessment of my historic astronaut website. In fact, this was to be a evaluate by skeptics; a overview by New Age believers would be worthless. Their weblog’s description was “essential reviews of paranormal claims on the Internet.” The intermediary granted them 5 days to carry out their overview but that has lengthy since come and gone, and never a word from them. My website presents an unlimited quantity of evidence and, in fact, I could not expect anybody to supply a very good essential review in simply 5 days. No one, together with myself, would wish to see quickly ready and frivolous arguments, else I’d make them look ridiculous in my counter arguments. Moreover, a few of my proof comes from Spanish-language sources and, to begin, they would wish time to confirm that none of it is a hoax. They are welcome to all the time they need.

What to expect from this blog is uncertain. There are skeptics who’re as narrow-minded in their considering as their New Age counterparts, and then once more, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively consider the proof to reach on the reality. Was there a real ancient astronaut? To help the skeptics reply that question, I’ll give them some concepts on how one can refute my theories. Here, solely for area issues, I will think about the archaeological proof, leaving apart concepts on the right way to refute the cryptology and theology proof for one more day.

My website reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. A kind of engravings depicts the alleged ancient astronaut as an aquatic with a three-pronged tail, with every of the three prongs ending in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Straightforward. They merely have to reveal that the shape of these pods resembles some form of animal or vegetation to be found in that area. In other phrases, they should find a terrestrial supply for these engravings, in any other case my extraterrestrial arguments remain unhurt.      The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Traces in Peru, so the traditional astronaut of both places must be one and the same. For Nazca, the skeptics will find many ready-made arguments, but I think about all of them weak. The mentality of the individuals of Nazca cannot be assumed to be unique in human history. It has to be demonstrated that folks elsewhere also believed that the sun, moon, or sky-spirits had physical eyes that could observe ground drawings. Alternatively, it needs to be demonstrated that the individuals of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence.

The recorded engravings on the cosmological Sun Disk, alleged alien artifact, might show to be the biggest problem for the skeptics. How are we to believe that the Andeans of the early sixteenth century a) knew that the Earth was round, b) knew that it was potential to orbit the Earth, c) knew that sunlight striking the moon may replicate again to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the darkish clouds alongside the Milky Way contained stars inside, and e) knew that water fashioned the idea of plant and animal evolution? Right here the skeptics would wish to search out parallels in the history of western civilization. I look forward to their response. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *