Ancient Astronauts And Contemporary Skepticism

Over the course of the past 12 months, I carefully assisted a colleague in writing a series of ten articles masking diverse aspects of my ancient astronaut idea. All ten of these articles circulated broadly across the globe and think about counters on many websites indicated plentiful readership, however suggestions to me, or to her, from wherever, was non-existent. There was neither criticism nor acclaim from anybody. Just silence. I was beginning to suppose that maybe nobody in world needs to take historic astronauts seriously.

In an try to make some progress, I made a decision to pay sixty dollars for a evaluation of my historical astronaut web site. After all, this was to be a evaluation by skeptics; a evaluate by New Age believers would be worthless. Their blog’s description was “critical opinions of paranormal claims on the Web.” The intermediary granted them five days to perform their overview but that has lengthy since come and gone, and not a phrase from them. My website presents an unlimited amount of evidence and, in fact, I could not count on anybody to provide a great important overview in simply 5 days. No one, together with myself, would need to see rapidly ready and frivolous arguments, else I would make them look ridiculous in my counter arguments. Moreover, a few of my evidence comes from Spanish-language sources and, to start, they would wish time to confirm that none of it is a hoax. They are welcome to all the time they want.

What to expect from this blog is uncertain. There are skeptics who are as narrow-minded in their pondering as their New Age counterparts, and then again, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively consider the proof to reach on the truth. Was there a real historical astronaut? To help the skeptics reply that question, I will give them some concepts on find out how to refute my theories. Right here, solely for space concerns, I’ll concentrate on the archaeological proof, leaving aside ideas on learn how to refute the cryptology and theology evidence for an additional day.

My website reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. A type of engravings depicts the alleged historic astronaut as an aquatic with a three-pronged tail, with every of the three prongs ending in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Easy. They merely must demonstrate that the form of these pods resembles some type of animal or plants to be found in that area. In other phrases, they need to discover a terrestrial supply for those engravings, in any other case my extraterrestrial arguments stay unhurt.      The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Lines in Peru, so the traditional astronaut of each places must be one and the identical. For Nazca, the skeptics will find many ready-made arguments, but I consider all of them weak. The mentality of the individuals of Nazca can’t be assumed to be unique in human historical past. It needs to be demonstrated that people elsewhere also believed that the sun, moon, or sky-spirits had physical eyes that could observe floor drawings. Alternatively, it must be demonstrated that the individuals of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence.

The recorded engravings on the cosmological Sun Disk, alleged alien artifact, might show to be the most important challenge for the skeptics. How are we to believe that the Andeans of the early sixteenth century a) knew that the Earth was spherical, b) knew that it was doable to orbit the Earth, c) knew that daylight hanging the moon could replicate again to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the darkish clouds along the Milky Method contained stars inside, and e) knew that water fashioned the idea of plant and animal evolution? Right here the skeptics would want to seek out parallels within the historical past of western civilization. I sit up for their response. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *