Ancient Astronauts And Contemporary Skepticism

Over the course of the past year, I carefully assisted a colleague in writing a collection of ten articles masking diverse features of my historical astronaut principle. All ten of these articles circulated broadly across the globe and look at counters on many websites indicated plentiful readership, but suggestions to me, or to her, from wherever, was non-existent. There was neither criticism nor acclaim from anybody. Simply silence. I was beginning to think that perhaps nobody in world wants to take ancient astronauts severely.

In an try and make some progress, I decided to pay sixty dollars for a assessment of my historical astronaut website. After all, this was to be a evaluation by skeptics; a overview by New Age believers can be worthless. Their blog’s description was “critical evaluations of paranormal claims on the Internet.” The middleman granted them five days to perform their review however that has lengthy since come and gone, and not a word from them. My web site presents an unlimited quantity of evidence and, in fact, I couldn’t expect anyone to produce a good critical overview in just 5 days. Nobody, including myself, would wish to see shortly prepared and frivolous arguments, else I would make them look ridiculous in my counter arguments. Furthermore, a few of my evidence comes from Spanish-language sources and, to start, they would want time to confirm that none of it’s a hoax. They are welcome to all the time they need.

What to anticipate from this weblog is uncertain. There are skeptics who’re as narrow-minded in their pondering as their New Age counterparts, after which once more, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively evaluate the proof to reach at the reality. Was there a real historical astronaut? To assist the skeptics answer that query, I’ll give them some ideas on the right way to refute my theories. Here, solely for space considerations, I’ll concentrate on the archaeological evidence, leaving apart concepts on the best way to refute the cryptology and theology proof for another day.

My web site reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. A kind of engravings depicts the alleged historical astronaut as an aquatic with a three-pronged tail, with each of the three prongs ending in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Straightforward. They merely must demonstrate that the form of those pods resembles some type of animal or flowers to be present in that area. In different words, they need to discover a terrestrial source for these engravings, in any other case my extraterrestrial arguments remain unhurt.      The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Traces in Peru, so the traditional astronaut of each places needs to be one and the same. For Nazca, the skeptics will discover many ready-made arguments, however I think about all of them weak. The mentality of the people of Nazca can’t be assumed to be unique in human historical past. It must be demonstrated that individuals elsewhere additionally believed that the solar, moon, or sky-spirits had bodily eyes that could observe ground drawings. Alternatively, it must be demonstrated that the individuals of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence.

The recorded engravings on the cosmological Solar Disk, alleged alien artifact, could show to be the biggest problem for the skeptics. How are we to consider that the Andeans of the early sixteenth century a) knew that the Earth was round, b) knew that it was doable to orbit the Earth, c) knew that daylight hanging the moon could reflect back to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the darkish clouds along the Milky Means contained stars inside, and e) knew that water fashioned the premise of plant and animal evolution? Here the skeptics would wish to search out parallels within the historical past of western civilization. I stay up for their response. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *